This article is published in English.
Practical notes: Prompt Injection and Agent Security: The Unsolved Problem
Operable walkthrough of Practical notes: Prompt Injection and Agent Security: The Unsolved Problem: contracts, checks, and drop-in code slots for teams shipping this pattern.
Use this as an operator-facing rebuild of the ideas in “Prompt Injection and Agent Security: The Unsolved Problem”: clear stages, ordered code slots, and recovery notes that survive a handoff. The Overview stage works best when treated as a measurable surface. Capture one golden transcript, one failure case, and the rollback note before expanding scope. Prefer small, testable units over sprawling scripts. When a step fails, the failure should point at a single responsibility rather than a tangled pipeline.
Why an agent can’t tell friend from foe
For the Why an agent can stage, define the inputs, the owner of the step, and the exit criteria before changing code. Operators should be able to re-run the step from a known checkpoint without guessing hidden state. Treat this stage as a contract between inputs and validated outputs. Name the artifacts, define success checks, and refuse silent partial completion. Prefer structured outputs with schema validation over free-form prose when the next step is code or a tool call.
The lethal trifecta
For the The lethal trifecta stage, define the inputs, the owner of the step, and the exit criteria before changing code. Operators should be able to re-run the step from a known checkpoint without guessing hidden state. Record timings and token or query cost next to functional results. Cost visibility early prevents surprise bills when the path moves from demo to shared environments. Prefer structured outputs with schema validation over free-form prose when the next step is code or a tool call.
Why agents make this so much worse than chatbots
For the Why agents make this stage, define the inputs, the owner of the step, and the exit criteria before changing code. Operators should be able to re-run the step from a known checkpoint without guessing hidden state. Keep configuration outside application code. Environment files, secret stores, and feature flags belong in one place operators can audit without reading the whole graph. Prefer structured outputs with schema validation over free-form prose when the next step is code or a tool call. For the Why agents make this stage, define the inputs, the owner of the step, and the exit criteria before changing code. Operators should be able to re-run the step from a known checkpoint without guessing hidden state. Prefer small, testable units over sprawling scripts. When a step fails, the failure should point at a single responsibility rather than a tangled pipeline.
The defenses that actually help
When working through the The defenses that actually stage, write down the contract first: required inputs, success signal, and what happens on partial failure. That checklist keeps later code changes honest. Treat this stage as a contract between inputs and validated outputs. Name the artifacts, define success checks, and refuse silent partial completion. Cache stable system instructions and tool schemas. Re-sending identical preamble is a common source of burn.
Three incidents worth studying in full
When working through the Three incidents worth studying stage, write down the contract first: required inputs, success signal, and what happens on partial failure. That checklist keeps later code changes honest. Record timings and token or query cost next to functional results. Cost visibility early prevents surprise bills when the path moves from demo to shared environments. Cache stable system instructions and tool schemas. Re-sending identical preamble is a common source of burn.
The tool and framework landscape
When working through the The tool and framework stage, write down the contract first: required inputs, success signal, and what happens on partial failure. That checklist keeps later code changes honest. Keep configuration outside application code. Environment files, secret stores, and feature flags belong in one place operators can audit without reading the whole graph. Cache stable system instructions and tool schemas. Re-sending identical preamble is a common source of burn. When working through the The tool and framework stage, write down the contract first: required inputs, success signal, and what happens on partial failure. That checklist keeps later code changes honest. Prefer small, testable units over sprawling scripts. When a step fails, the failure should point at a single responsibility rather than a tangled pipeline.
A field guide to the failure modes
The A field guide to stage works best when treated as a measurable surface. Capture one golden transcript, one failure case, and the rollback note before expanding scope. Treat this stage as a contract between inputs and validated outputs. Name the artifacts, define success checks, and refuse silent partial completion. Budget tokens per turn and per session. Agentic tools expand context aggressively; hard caps keep demos from becoming surprise invoices.
Getting started: a one-week security pass
The Getting started a one-week stage works best when treated as a measurable surface. Capture one golden transcript, one failure case, and the rollback note before expanding scope. Record timings and token or query cost next to functional results. Cost visibility early prevents surprise bills when the path moves from demo to shared environments. Budget tokens per turn and per session. Agentic tools expand context aggressively; hard caps keep demos from becoming surprise invoices.
The honest conclusion
The The honest conclusion stage works best when treated as a measurable surface. Capture one golden transcript, one failure case, and the rollback note before expanding scope. Keep configuration outside application code. Environment files, secret stores, and feature flags belong in one place operators can audit without reading the whole graph. Budget tokens per turn and per session. Agentic tools expand context aggressively; hard caps keep demos from becoming surprise invoices. The The honest conclusion stage works best when treated as a measurable surface. Capture one golden transcript, one failure case, and the rollback note before expanding scope. Prefer small, testable units over sprawling scripts. When a step fails, the failure should point at a single responsibility rather than a tangled pipeline.
Operational checklist
When working through the Operational checklist stage, write down the contract first: required inputs, success signal, and what happens on partial failure. That checklist keeps later code changes honest.
Document the happy path and the recovery path together. Retries, human gates, and dead-letter handling are part of the product, not later polish.
Cache stable system instructions and tool schemas. Re-sending identical preamble is a common source of burn.
Keep graph state flat and typed. Nested blobs hide which node wrote which field and break resume after interrupts.
Add a smoke test that exercises the critical path in CI with fixtures, not live paid APIs, whenever budgets allow.
Record timings and token or query cost next to functional results. Cost visibility early prevents surprise bills when the path moves from demo to shared environments.
Before promoting the stack, freeze versions, capture a golden transcript for the critical path, and confirm rollback steps. Shared environments need rate limits, tenancy checks, and a clear owner for secret rotation. Prefer boring reliability over clever one-off demos.
Batch note for f33da2f7b6f7: keep provider keys out of the repo, set a per-session token ceiling, and store transcripts next to the eval fixtures so later model swaps stay comparable.
The hardening note 0 stage works best when treated as a measurable surface. Capture one golden transcript, one failure case, and the rollback note before expanding scope. Record timings and token or query cost next to functional results. Cost visibility early prevents surprise bills when the path moves from demo to shared environments.
Hardening detail 0/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
For the hardening note 1 stage, define the inputs, the owner of the step, and the exit criteria before changing code. Operators should be able to re-run the step from a known checkpoint without guessing hidden state. Document the happy path and the recovery path together. Retries, human gates, and dead-letter handling are part of the product, not later polish.
Hardening detail 1/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
When working through the hardening note 2 stage, write down the contract first: required inputs, success signal, and what happens on partial failure. That checklist keeps later code changes honest. Treat this stage as a contract between inputs and validated outputs. Name the artifacts, define success checks, and refuse silent partial completion.
Hardening detail 2/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
The hardening note 3 stage works best when treated as a measurable surface. Capture one golden transcript, one failure case, and the rollback note before expanding scope. Keep configuration outside application code. Environment files, secret stores, and feature flags belong in one place operators can audit without reading the whole graph.
Hardening detail 3/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
For the hardening note 4 stage, define the inputs, the owner of the step, and the exit criteria before changing code. Operators should be able to re-run the step from a known checkpoint without guessing hidden state. Prefer small, testable units over sprawling scripts. When a step fails, the failure should point at a single responsibility rather than a tangled pipeline.
Hardening detail 4/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
When working through the hardening note 5 stage, write down the contract first: required inputs, success signal, and what happens on partial failure. That checklist keeps later code changes honest. Record timings and token or query cost next to functional results. Cost visibility early prevents surprise bills when the path moves from demo to shared environments.
Hardening detail 5/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
The hardening note 6 stage works best when treated as a measurable surface. Capture one golden transcript, one failure case, and the rollback note before expanding scope. Document the happy path and the recovery path together. Retries, human gates, and dead-letter handling are part of the product, not later polish.
Hardening detail 6/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
For the hardening note 7 stage, define the inputs, the owner of the step, and the exit criteria before changing code. Operators should be able to re-run the step from a known checkpoint without guessing hidden state. Treat this stage as a contract between inputs and validated outputs. Name the artifacts, define success checks, and refuse silent partial completion.
Hardening detail 7/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
When working through the hardening note 8 stage, write down the contract first: required inputs, success signal, and what happens on partial failure. That checklist keeps later code changes honest. Keep configuration outside application code. Environment files, secret stores, and feature flags belong in one place operators can audit without reading the whole graph.
Hardening detail 8/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
The hardening note 9 stage works best when treated as a measurable surface. Capture one golden transcript, one failure case, and the rollback note before expanding scope. Prefer small, testable units over sprawling scripts. When a step fails, the failure should point at a single responsibility rather than a tangled pipeline.
Hardening detail 9/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
For the hardening note 10 stage, define the inputs, the owner of the step, and the exit criteria before changing code. Operators should be able to re-run the step from a known checkpoint without guessing hidden state. Record timings and token or query cost next to functional results. Cost visibility early prevents surprise bills when the path moves from demo to shared environments.
Hardening detail 10/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
When working through the hardening note 11 stage, write down the contract first: required inputs, success signal, and what happens on partial failure. That checklist keeps later code changes honest. Document the happy path and the recovery path together. Retries, human gates, and dead-letter handling are part of the product, not later polish.
Hardening detail 11/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
The hardening note 12 stage works best when treated as a measurable surface. Capture one golden transcript, one failure case, and the rollback note before expanding scope. Treat this stage as a contract between inputs and validated outputs. Name the artifacts, define success checks, and refuse silent partial completion.
Hardening detail 12/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
For the hardening note 13 stage, define the inputs, the owner of the step, and the exit criteria before changing code. Operators should be able to re-run the step from a known checkpoint without guessing hidden state. Keep configuration outside application code. Environment files, secret stores, and feature flags belong in one place operators can audit without reading the whole graph.
Hardening detail 13/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
When working through the hardening note 14 stage, write down the contract first: required inputs, success signal, and what happens on partial failure. That checklist keeps later code changes honest. Prefer small, testable units over sprawling scripts. When a step fails, the failure should point at a single responsibility rather than a tangled pipeline.
Hardening detail 14/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
The hardening note 15 stage works best when treated as a measurable surface. Capture one golden transcript, one failure case, and the rollback note before expanding scope. Record timings and token or query cost next to functional results. Cost visibility early prevents surprise bills when the path moves from demo to shared environments.
Hardening detail 15/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
For the hardening note 16 stage, define the inputs, the owner of the step, and the exit criteria before changing code. Operators should be able to re-run the step from a known checkpoint without guessing hidden state. Document the happy path and the recovery path together. Retries, human gates, and dead-letter handling are part of the product, not later polish.
Hardening detail 16/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
When working through the hardening note 17 stage, write down the contract first: required inputs, success signal, and what happens on partial failure. That checklist keeps later code changes honest. Treat this stage as a contract between inputs and validated outputs. Name the artifacts, define success checks, and refuse silent partial completion.
Hardening detail 17/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
The hardening note 18 stage works best when treated as a measurable surface. Capture one golden transcript, one failure case, and the rollback note before expanding scope. Keep configuration outside application code. Environment files, secret stores, and feature flags belong in one place operators can audit without reading the whole graph.
Hardening detail 18/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
For the hardening note 19 stage, define the inputs, the owner of the step, and the exit criteria before changing code. Operators should be able to re-run the step from a known checkpoint without guessing hidden state. Prefer small, testable units over sprawling scripts. When a step fails, the failure should point at a single responsibility rather than a tangled pipeline.
Hardening detail 19/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
When working through the hardening note 20 stage, write down the contract first: required inputs, success signal, and what happens on partial failure. That checklist keeps later code changes honest. Record timings and token or query cost next to functional results. Cost visibility early prevents surprise bills when the path moves from demo to shared environments.
Hardening detail 20/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
The hardening note 21 stage works best when treated as a measurable surface. Capture one golden transcript, one failure case, and the rollback note before expanding scope. Document the happy path and the recovery path together. Retries, human gates, and dead-letter handling are part of the product, not later polish.
Hardening detail 21/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.
For the hardening note 22 stage, define the inputs, the owner of the step, and the exit criteria before changing code. Operators should be able to re-run the step from a known checkpoint without guessing hidden state. Treat this stage as a contract between inputs and validated outputs. Name the artifacts, define success checks, and refuse silent partial completion.
Hardening detail 22/917: measure wall time, error class, and token spend for this note, then decide whether to keep the change based on a fixed question set rather than anecdote.